I'm not opposed to Tanner's reaction, though it does seem to suggest he's something of an idiot, which he is not. I've gotten many thoughtful answers, though I still think it was just bad writing. And why didn't Bond disable the surveillance camera upon entering the cabin? He obviously noticed it!īelieve it or not, I've not managed to see Spectre more than once, so my answers may be a bit hazy on these. Why is it so bad to play the tape of Madeline's father committing suicide? It didn't reveal anything that Bond hasn't already tell her. However, there are a still a few things I don't quite understand: It doesn't seem to stop their success or the films from making money, so no one really cares, but quality is, in my opinion, suffering terribly.Īfter seeing it a 5th time it still feels like a near perfect Bond film. They don't seem to have much depth of instinct when it comes to story, but rather learn some formula about a script structure and then overlook meaningful details. However, I think it's really just the poor quality of screen writers today. He certainly has many of the traits, and more so in this film than before, but he's still not the same agent, and we could argue that this one is meant to be less capable in this respect than his doppelganger. One thing to consider, though, is in this reboot version of Bond, he's not the same guy exactly we've seen before. But the story certainly can continue with Bond doing something stupid. That Bond doesn't make sure the surveillance tapes are erased would not be a plot hole, but just a silly thing for an agent to do. More recently, people have used to term - or perhaps misused it - in popular context to simply mean anything they don't like. Think of the thugs in the 1989 Batman waiting for him in the cathedral when there is no way within the story to explain how they got there. Traditionally, this is reserved for something that can't be resolved within the logic of the story. Why kill himself in front of Bond anyway? Bond should have destroyed the records as a matter of professional precaution - how could he let secret information remain recorded and available to whoever found the body? This is the single piece of bad scriptwriting that lets down the whole movie - I would be able to forgive the other plot holes, but not this. White should know what SPECTRE is about and should either provide Bond with the information out of reach of cameras and microphones, or should have erased the records before killing himself. Mr White divulged a big secret to Bond, allowed it to be recorded by his own surveillance system, and then killed himself. And why didn't Bond disable the surveillance camera upon entering the cabin? He obviously noticed it! Why is it so bad to play the tape of Madeline's father committing suicide? It didn't reveal anything that Bond hasn't already told her. Why does Blofeld emphasize that he remembers? Of course he remembers. A 9mm under the sink by the bleach? What does bleach have to do with it?īlofeld's story about visiting Madeline's house seems oddly redundant, but unrelated to the above story. I can't understand what Madeline is saying when she explains why she doesn't like guns. Towards the end of the film we see an aerial shot of the London Eye and Big Ben and yet the filmmakers still feel the need to add the title "London" as if we didn't know! Then overact as he stares at his own hand dumbfounded that Bond wouldn't take it. Why would Tanner look so surprised that Bond didn't take his hand over the slippery section. Why does Bond know that Max can also be called C? Why does Bond insist on calling him C as if it was somehow insulting? However, there are a still a few things I don't quite get. After seeing it a 5th time it still feels like a near perfect Bond film.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |